Passer au contenu principal Passer au pied de page

Inequity of property taxation: What's the cost and what must be done?

Ontario Property Taxes Hero Image
Property taxes are the single-largest operating expense for most commercial real estate properties.
Canadian property taxes are ad valorem, or market-value based. In other words, within classes of property, higher-valued properties pay more property tax.

Annual property tax reassessments are the gold standard in market value-based property tax systems.

Annual reassessments link the quantum of property tax to the market value of property; they improve the accuracy, correctness and equity of the assessment roll and expedite the review, and where appropriate, the appeal of property tax assessments by owners. 

CRE owners, users pay price of reassessment delays
Where reassessments are not annual, and particularly in extreme cases where reassessments have not occurred for many years, all stakeholders suffer.

Owners of real estate are, however, particularly negatively impacted by reassessment delays. This is especially true for owners and users of commercial real estate.

In Toronto, Ottawa and elsewhere in Ontario, commercial property tax rates are significantly higher than those of residential taxpayers.

In 2022, commercial property owners in Toronto and Ottawa were respectively paying 3.36 and 2.39 times the property tax rates paid by residential property owners.

This occurs despite commercial property taxpayers not receiving the scope of services provided residential taxpayers.

In Ontario, the inequity of the property taxation imposed on commercial taxpayers has been compounded by recent reassessment delays. 

Absent a reassessment, the primary recourse of commercial real estate owners and users is the property tax assessment review and appeal process, and more particularly, the annual right of appeal.

This is as true in jurisdictions with multi-year assessment cycles as in jurisdictions with annual reassessments.

Recently in Ontario, the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and some municipalities have challenged the annual right of appeal.

In the context of the extended seven-year assessment cycle, this has reinforced the value of annual reassessments and appeals.

Precedents for appeal rights
Fortunately, there are favourable precedents from Ontario courts and those of other jurisdictions regarding annual appeal rights.

Most recently, on Jan. 6, 2023, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal in Brandt Properties Ltd. v Sherwood (Rural Municipality) reinforced the function of annual appeals during multi-year assessment cycles:

"As noted, the assessment appeal for each year is independent of appeals in other years. As a practical matter, it can of course be expected that, if the assessor takes the same approach in Years 1 and 2, and the property owner, on appeal, advances the same evidence and argument in Years 1 and 2, the results in both years will be the same. But, for Year 2, the issue will always be whether the evidence and argument advanced in relation to that year’s assessment establish assessor error. It will never be appropriate to approach a Year 2 appeal as if the property owner has the burden of overcoming the board’s or the committee’s Year 1 decision."

That said, the reassessment freeze, which produced this seven-year cycle, has compounded the challenges faced by commercial real estate owners and users in Ontario.

The amount of property tax remains based on real estate values as of Jan. 1, 2016.

Accordingly, relative changes in value between types of property are not reflected in taxation.

Usually, in market value-based property tax systems, the relative value of property is frequently adjusted with corresponding changes in property taxes. That has not occurred in Ontario since before the pandemic. 

To illustrate, consider the change in value experienced by industrial as compared with office property from 2016 through 2022, and the relative change in value of the five major commercial property classes: industrial, retail, apartment, hotel and office during this same period.

There was no corresponding change in property taxation during this period.

Property taxes Image 01

Property taxes Image 02

Property taxes Image 03

Annual assessments benefit all stakeholders
Infrequent reassessments entrench inequity of taxation. Municipalities do not reimburse or provide other financial compensation to commercial real estate owners or their tenants if the property tax they paid failed to reflect their properties’ relative market performance.

While property taxes will be increasing, the redistribution of property tax associated with a reassessment will not occur as, for 2023 taxation, property assessment values continue to be based on values as of Jan. 1, 2016.

The transparency and fairness of the property tax assessment system in Ontario require property assessments based on current or nearly current values.

Even if this inequity is addressed by tax mitigation tools, transparency, equity and efficiency – the hallmarks of a market valued-based property tax assessment system – are sacrificed.

The solution is a reassessment for 2024, and reassessment annually thereafter. All stakeholders benefit when changes in property values are promptly reflected in annual assessments.

Read on RENX

Pour plus d’informations, veuillez contacter:

Robert Brazzell

Managing Director | Property Tax Services | Ontario

Toronto Downtown

As an Executive Director at Colliers International I am fortunate to lead a passionate team that assists  real estate owners and their tenants to take a proactive approach in reviewing and reducing  their property assessments and taxation. Our growing team of professionals strives to serve our clients above and beyond their expectations.

I am a legal and business professional with over 20 years of experience developing and leading corporate strategies to grow value; expand corporate presence; and protect corporate interests. I have provided legal support and business guidance and direction to property tax practice groups in Canada and the United States. Throughout my career I have successfully leveraged innovative approaches and established strategic relationships to deliver professional services, build market share and increase revenue. 

Applying the knowledge and skills I have acquired providing counsel to an administrative tribunal, serving as an Acting Chair of a provincial property tax assessment appeal board, and representing taxpayers in proceedings before property tax assessment appeal tribunals across Canada my role has most recently included providing legal representation in high value property tax assessment appeals in Ontario. As a property assessment appeal advocate my goal is ensuring the most cost-effective management of my client’s property tax assessments and property tax liabilities so they can realize their corporate objectives. I am focused on this goal and on delivering value to clients but always in the context of a commitment to ethical standards and operating with integrity


Voir l'expert